Qualify value and hard gates

Turn a promising workflow into an accountable outcome, counterfactual, cost ceiling, verifier, and decision to discover, build, defer, or stop.

Self-directed lesson

Field question
What measurable outcome is worth pursuing, compared with what, and what would make us stop?
Working artifact
Workflow charter + value case
Effort
90–120 minutes

You will learn

  • Why the counterfactual and adoption-adjusted value matter more than demo accuracy.
  • How data, process, governance, and accountable capability become hard gates—not maturity scores.
  • How full operating cost changes mechanism and rollout decisions.

Field practice

  1. Define the eligible workflow, baseline, target, owner, verifier, and measurement window.
  2. Estimate model, infrastructure, human review, exception, and change costs.
  3. Record the constraint that blocks bounded kickoff and the next action that resolves it.

Before you begin

Bring an observed workflow boundary, a business owner, and enough evidence to describe the current counterfactual.

Learning objectives

  • Define an accepted outcome, baseline, measurement window, owner, verifier, and stop threshold.
  • Estimate full operating cost rather than model cost alone.
  • Use data, process, governance, and accountable-capability constraints as gates, not maturity scores.

Core lesson

What you need to know

01

Turn interest into a decision contract

A useful value case begins with the decision event: what funding, continuation, acceptance, renewal, or reshape decision must be made, by when, and with what economic exposure. Define the eligible workflow and exclusions before calculating value so the numerator and denominator cannot drift after the fact.

Record the current baseline, target, measurement window, metric owner, independent verifier, adoption or operating indicator, decision threshold, and attribution limits. Missing values remain explicit unknowns and route the next field move; they do not become optimistic defaults.

02

Model the complete cost and counterfactual

Compare against what would happen without the proposed system: existing manual work, a rules change, process redesign, or doing nothing. Include model and infrastructure spend, integration, human review, exceptions, incident response, change management, evaluation, and support. Adoption-adjusted value matters because unused automation creates no operating outcome.

Use four constraint gates: data, process, governance, and accountable capability. Each is satisfied, blocking, unknown, or not applicable with evidence and limitations. A blocking or required unknown gate prevents bounded kickoff, but it does not prevent continued discovery. Never average the gates into a maturity score that hides the weakest constraint.

For the data gate, inspect the exact decision inputs rather than scoring generic data maturity. Record source and label authority, permitted purpose, representative coverage, preparation lineage, freshness, access and retention limits, missing-data behavior, remediation owner, and remediation cost. A large repository can still be unready for the one decision that matters.

03

Choose scale, reshape, defer, or stop

Predefine the evidence that will trigger the next decision. A strong charter can conclude that the workflow is not yet eligible for value modeling or that a smaller slice is economically defensible. The artifact should make stopping as legitimate and observable as continuing.

Worked field case

Denial correction pilot economics

A practice leader must decide whether to fund a second implementation phase in 30 days.

Evidence available

  • Baseline: median 42 minutes from denial receipt to reviewed correction for the eligible NorthLake cohort.
  • Sold acceptance target: 30% average handling-time improvement without an attached metric contract. Proposed four-week continuation floor: at least 15% reduction in median receipt-to-reviewed-correction time, at least 70% adoption, and no guardrail breach; the different floor and metric do not amend the sold target.
  • Cost basis: model, integration, specialist review, exception handling, evaluation, and support for the measurement window.

Reasoning path

  1. Bind the outcome to the eligible cohort and current manual counterfactual.
  2. Set a decision threshold: continue only if adoption exceeds 70%, time falls at least 15%, and guardrails remain within limit.
  3. Mark governance blocking until submission authority and metric verification are assigned.
Result

The funding decision becomes scale, reshape, or stop against explicit evidence rather than a generic pilot-success claim.

Practice exercise

Build a one-page value case

Choose one bounded workflow with a decision event in the next 30–60 days.

  1. Define decision event, deadline, economic exposure, eligible workflow, and exclusions.
  2. Record baseline, target, owner, verifier, adoption indicator, and decision threshold.
  3. Estimate complete operating cost and name the counterfactual.
  4. Assess the four gates—including decision-bound data authority, quality, freshness, and remediation economics—and route the highest-impact unknown or blocker.
Keep

A workflow charter and value case that can support a real continue, reshape, defer, or stop decision.

Review your work

Field rubric

  • The outcome is bounded, measurable, and tied to a decision event.
  • The counterfactual and full cost basis are explicit.
  • Owners and independent verification are not inferred.
  • No maturity score hides a blocking or unknown constraint.

Complete when

  • The decision threshold is defined before results are observed.
  • Every required gate has a status, evidence, limitation, and next action.
  • The value case supports stopping as well as continuing.

Check your understanding

If the model disappeared, could you still explain the business decision and its evidence?

Working formats

Use the editable Word workbook for field-facing work. The source Markdown remains useful for technical records and versionable reference.

Guided study and progress

Open this mission in the guided school to confirm the exercise and rubric, save completion in this browser, and resume the ten-mission path.

Open guided mission

Compare and go deeper

This lesson is self-contained. Compare your work with the calibrated answer, then use the attributed references when you need governed detail or additional implementation practice.

Annotated answerFDE Guide reference ↗Attributed technical depth ↗